Selected Films

Wow, I’ve seen this movie to call around for ages and finally rented it out. The plot is so terrible its funny (A scientist creates genetic mutant bats - why “Because that is what the scientists’) - make the film but works in a kitchen, shlock level - if you like horror movies and not too sticky serious then you’ll love this.

Word of warning, though entertaining, does not see this movie if you know something about the film - is completely lighted and more in this movie almost destroyed me. (Actually scrub that, watch and learn a valuable lesson about the dangers of excessive lighting - its so bad that makes the dialogue seem good!) Watch and enjoy with their friends - conversations that lead to this film is more entertaining itself.For the film that I am grateful - money well spent! Oh, and Lou Diamond Phillips - what a legend.

read comments (2)

Yes, it scareyo blood can sometimes appear to be avoided, but always on foot to manage risk in zone.Even though you know you do not enter the danger zone and being plain stupid, you do not can not jump and wince as they do. It is a great Friday night beer and curry night for fear the winter, a little film. Some sexual abuse in a body that can make squirm.

I am now tempted to see the 1973 version just to compare. Well, I mean movies are more realistic and impressive special concern now, so I guess that the 1973 version is tame. But we have to see.

read comments (0)

I really enjoyed this movie, good cast, good atmosphere. If it is not bad at all. definatley worth seeing.

Dog lovers hate (so if the girl and are best friends, do not bother!) This is unless you like to see your pet Poodle rippin ‘a human corpse, of course, if you’re looking for a man afraid this could not as good for you, although I am sure that the K9 acted their hearts just are not that fear and hatred that is always how this type of film to open a direct to DVD sequel.

Anyway now I have all of my chest I am going back to the “not bad, not bad at all.”

read comments (5)

This film has been around a couple of years - you can even get a Russian DVD has subtitles in English. The film begins with a battle between light and darkness. Evenly combined groups created to monitor the others (the film focuses on the Night Watch who control the forces of darkness).

But one day someone will come to choose between light and darkness and the day to win that way … and thus arrive until today, where the night Watch Anton encounters when trying to use a witch for nefarious purposes. Time after is one of the Night Watch - meetings and an apocalyptic situation, while the search for vampires. Visually interesting, but in terms of history was unsurprised to learn that this was adapted from a series of books.

Unlike many adaptations of the afternoon - LOTR, Serenity - I think that for this, you need not have read the books. Too many jumps, and the parties simply does not make sense - so take these books cover. But overall, nice.

Maybe it will improve over the next 2 parts? Sorry, the spider doll disappeared soon though.

It reminded me of the thing!

read comments (1)

After Halloween Camp (I) i had reasonably high hopes for this film, but were canceled in the first half hour of this sequal. The new director / writer has not done the glory of what was already a series of poorly received films.

Personally I liked the first of these levels: good plot, good acting, it was a great blood, creative deaths. None of these items returned to what seemed like a larger budget to refund Halloween Camp franchise …. not that much of your franchise. Crappy deaths, poor performance, location and lame slow, boring, and that this underacted lines to avoid a movie!

Well it was not unbearable, but i didn’t see it until the end - not just didn’t seem the point!

read comments (2)

Never ceases to amaze how a small budget and / or independent filmmakers constantly overshadow the major studios to produce intelligent and highly entertaining film. “28 Days” is the story of hubris, the loss of innocence, the folly of the belief that our governments can truly protect us and the idea that we all have the power to survive if there is a deep enoughWhat great movie, from the initial irony of how the virus escapes through a terrifying vision of London to end a truly disturbing section that shows humans may be even less human than the monsters.Intelligent, cool, terrifying, disturbing, stimulating and entertaining. What movie.I recommend this movie to anyone who wants to be thrilled, scared and without shirt, given the opportunity to see the film at its most raw materials and a compelling manner.

read comments (3)

Charlie McGhee (Marguerite Moreau) has become a beautiful young woman. Still has no control over their ability to channel her emotions into flame, though.

Also, is not a goon squad who seek the girl who gave these powers. She joined again Rainbird (played this time by Malcolm McDowell) in her attempts to control his anger, and now his power to set anything in its fiery path.

Also joining them are others who have similar freakish powers also by their scientific experiments corporation.This of a bad sequel to the 1984 film based on Stephen King’s novel follows a sexy Charlie through four hours of a mini-series which was shown on the Sci-Fi Channel. Loaded with pyrotechnics, flashbacks, and a new group of children affected, it has been revived as much in common with CARRIE and X-MEN than the original film starring Drew Barrymore.

read comments (12)

My brother had a book of this movie. When I was younger he would terrify me with the cover and tell me what the movie is about. Excited, I expected a time when I was old enough to see it.

That was almost 20 years. Weather changes, as well as tastes and expectations.

When I saw this was released on DVD I remembered all stories my brother told me about the movie and my anticipation grew as I saw it was Winging way for me. Its rare that I will leave a film crapness. But within 10 minutes of viewing this DVD was in its case and on their return.

Perhaps my expectations were too high. Maybe it was always an absolute bobbins.

I would say “you decide.” But seriously … this movie is absolute bobbins …

read comments (9)

To begin with myself, and I assure you that I am not alone here, I think David Lynch is one of the greatest filmmakers ever. Eraserhead is one of their elders. The film is not necessarily a movie full of symbolism about.

Its the most phenomenal director pouring their thoughts, moods and feelings in the subconscious which is essentially a fairly simple “plot.” He is interested in mood and imagery, of course, rather than dialogue. This well was not apart from Mamet, etc. and, obviously, limits their business resource, but do not some weirdo art. Perhaps it is a mistake to see this film as a puzzle to be solved, unlike Mullholand dr, is more than just deliver you a totally strange Lynch style and thoughts.

Because it is more likely than not you just tie yourself in knots about subtext and symbolism, but I’m not saying its wrong to do this. Anyway, instead you should just buckle up for one of the most imaginative, surreal and unforgettable films of movie history.

read comments (8)

If everyone sat down and thought about the best scary movies I had seen, there was no doubt that one or two of the works of John Carpenter in the top 20. For me, this film is John Carpenter horror.The the best works of film is set in the Bay of San Antonio today (well, 1979, but it really has the idea).

100 years ago, a man named Blake wanted to set up a leper colony for himself and his fellow lepers to live a peaceful life close to the new proposal by the city of San Antonio Bay. Blake was willing to pay much money for it and, once agreed, it departed with his ship to move his fellow lepers to the new colony. Blake disaster and the ship crashed into the rocks, killing everyone on board.

This occurred due to a mysterious light that guides ships into the rocks and a strange bright mist covered the rock ahead.100 years ago to the day, the mysterious fog returns … Why has the fog returned? Why people die on that? Want to know more? Get this movie!

A little of your time, but the pure horror is as fresh as it ever was!

read comments (12)

I’ve seen Shaun of the Dead again last night and as usual I was surprised how good it is a movie. Most horror films are a simple idea that orders of 15 minutes of screen time, padded with special effects where the characterization should be. Shaun is the opposite - 99 minutes full of well drawn characters, great performances, great humor, groaning eat fresh non-humans and the buckets of guts!

This and the recent remake of Dawn of the dead are the rules of zombie movies should be judged. Forget hugely disappointing and sympathetic Romero Land of the Dead - Shaun ROCKS!

read comments (17)

The film begins with a reading of Red Riding Hood. It’s simple but stylish and raised my hopes for the rest of the film. But what follows is a pretty standard stalk and slash film that does not create any tension or of great horror.

A group of young actors are used to perform Little Red Riding Hood for the lonely son of an aristocrat. A murderer enters the fray and use the mansion as his stalking ground isolation. My biggest problem with this film is never the sense that the characters were scared or worried about your situation.

The mansion of the film is impressive, but when a murderer is loose in the hope that their attempted escape of the victims not to admire the place. The victims are so soft and so similar to those of a hundred other films that are likely to be living on site and did not win very soon.

In the end, probably not gained attention. If you are looking for blood, look elsewhere. Only one of the dead is memorable, the rest can be described as functional.

In general this is a horror film of poor quality along the lines of: I know what you did last summer and Valentine. It uses a tired concept and brings nothing new in their execution. It may seem more elegant, but the soft substance.

If you want to recommend a best French horror Mellemspændingsprodukter (Switchblade Romance).

read comments (10)